Wilderness Education in Ukraine

European Wilderness Society puts a lot of efforts towards Wilderness education in different European countries for different target audience: adults and kids, professional nature conservationists and simple nature lovers!

Up-date 01.12.2017: Recently another National Nature Park of Ukraine “Yavorivskyy” received from us package of Wild 5 Journals and applied them during conduction of the eco-educational activities called “Know! Be proud! Save!” for participants of the youth clubs “Ecological local studies” and “Medical Plant”. NNP “Yavorivskyy” is a part of Biosphere Reserve “Roztochchya”, created under the aegis of UNESCO. Recent educational activities in the Park were dedicated to the celebration of the anniversary of adoption by the General Conference of UNESCO on 16 November1972 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage”.

Wild 5

Working in such a way, we are glad to state that our Wild 5 Journal is continuing its way across Ukraine, supporting ecological educational activities and helping youth and adults to understand better the environment and particularly Wilderness and its inhabitants, learn more about protected areas, climate change and how to behave once you meet a large carnivore.

One of the first, who introduced the Wild 5 Journal was our old partner, National Nature Park “Zacharovanyy kray”. We are continuing receiving orders for the Journal and its being used now in numerous protected areas of Ukraine, schools, after-school education institutions and eco-coteries and even in kindergartens. Among our recent partners is also Kiev Zoo and its permanent youth club. Here is the feedback provided by scientists and educators of the Zoo:

Thank you for the great journal for kids. Idea to acquaint children with representatives of European fauna is a hot topic. Topics are developed well, good design, information is provided attractively and corresponds to the age of the target audience.

They also provided some proposals regarding cohesiveness of information, which confirms that the journal was investigated by professional educators in deep details.

We were also asked when the next issue of Wild 5 will take place?

Podilsky Tovtry

Just lately we received the order for Wild 5 from one of the biggest National Parks not only in Ukraine but in the entire Europe “Podilsky Tovtry“. The area of this Unique National Nature Park of Western Ukraine is 261316 ha and it is located on the territory of warm Sarmat see, which existed here million years ago.

Prydnistrovska part of the Podilsky Tovtry is divided by numerous deep canyon-type tributaries of the river Dniester. Park also consists of wetlands of international importance and has mineral water reserves with unique therapeutic qualities. We hope one day this National Nature Park will become the member of European Wilderness Network.

Such nature beauty and dedicated team is also supports effective educational activities. Received from European Wilderness Society Wild 5 Journal was presented and distributed among educational institutions of the city and districts of the park territory during Animal Protection Month. Wild 5 supported school and kindergarten teachers during their presentations and communication with kids about animal world of Ukraine. Children admired attractive illustrations and new interesting information receiving, for example, how to behave during encounter with one of the Wild 5 heroes.

Next steps

All the partners-users of Wild 5 are very much interested in getting new educational materials from European Wilderness Society and in participation in our educational events.

This motivates us for the development and implementation of further Wilderness educational projects across Europe, which among other, we hope, will reduce volumes of poaching and illegal acitvities! Follow our news to learn about new events and publications on our web-site!

Let´s get wild!

You May Also Like

Please Leave a Comment

Join more 100+ forest experts demanding a radical change in German forestry management.

Sign the Open Letter to the German Federal Minister of Forestry and Agriculture

Open Letter to the German Ministry of Food and Agriculture

Federal Ministry of
Food and Agriculture
Minister Julia Klöckner
11055 Berlin

Dear Minister Klöckner,

The current situation of the forest in Germany is worrying. It is a forest crisis not only driven by climate change. The current crisis management of the forestry industry is backward-looking and harmful to the forest. The declaration announced at the meeting of ministers in Moritzburg can be described as a `Moritzburg declaration of bankruptcy´. We call on the state forestry industry to, instead of expensive rushed actions, finally carry out an expert analysis of its own work and to involve all stakeholders in this process. What is called for is a consistent departure from plantation forestry and a radical shift towards a management that treats the forest as an ecosystem and no longer as a wood factory.

On 1stAugust 2019, five forestry ministers of CDU and CSU-led states adopted a so-called “master plan” for the forest in Germany, which was affected by heat, bark beetles, fire and drought. As of 2020, the federal government is to make 800 million euros available as a reaction to climate change. This money is to be used to repair the damage caused, reforest the damaged areas and carry out `climate-adapted´ forest conversion – including the use of non-native tree species that have not yet been cultivated in the forest. Research should therefore focus on on tree species suitability and forest plant breeding in the future – keyword: `Climate-adapted forest of the future 2100´.

Remarkably, the damage caused primarily by the extreme drought of 2018 is attributed solely to climate change. Climate change is meeting a forest that is systemically ill due to the planting of non-native tree species, species poverty, monocultures, uniform structure, average low age, mechanical soil compaction, drainage etc. A healthy, resistant forest would look differently! The master plan emphasizes: sustainable, multifunctional and `active´ forest management remains indispensable – and thereby means that its unnatural state cannot be changed. Reference is made to the `carbon storage and substitution effects´ of wood products. The use of wood, e.g. in the construction industry, should be increased and thus the demand for wood should be further fueled – while knowing that the forest in Germany already cannot meet this demand. In fact, forest owners are suffering from poor timber prices due to an oversupply of trunk wood on the world market.

All these demands make clear: the current forestry strategy, which has been practiced for decades, should not change in principle. The concept is simple: cut down trees – plant trees. At best, the `design´ of the future artificial forests consisting of perfectly calculated tree species mixtures, that are believed to survive climate change without damages, can be changed. In all seriousness, the intention is to continue selling the public a so-called `future strategy´ to save the forest. This strategy seamlessly follows the model of a wood factory, that is met with general rejection and must be regarded as a failure in view of the coniferous plantations that are currently collapsing on a large scale. An essential part of the forests that have currently died is exactly the part that was reestablished in 1947 as coniferous monocultures on a much larger area than today. There is only one difference to the situation at the time: considerable amounts of money are to be made available from taxes for forest owners this time.

Climate change is progressing, and this, without a doubt, has massive impacts on all terrestrial ecosystems, including forests. To pretend that the last two years of drought alone caused the disaster is too cheap. On closer inspection, the disaster is also the result of decades of a forestry focused on conifers – in a country that was once naturally dominated by mixed deciduous forests. People do not like to admit that for more than 200 years they have relied on the wrong species of commercial tree (spruce) and have also created artificial, ecologically highly unstable and thus high-risk forest ecosystems. A whole branch of business has become dependent on coniferous wood. And now the German coniferous timber industry is on the verge of bankruptcy.

It would only have been honest and also a sign of political greatness if you and the forestry ministers in Moritzburg had declared: Yes, our forestry industry has made mistakes in the past, and yes, we are ready for a relentless analysis that takes into account not only purely silvicultural, but also forest-ecological aspects. Instead, you have confined yourselves to pre-stamped excuses that are already familiar to everyone and that lack any self-critical reflection.

Clear is: We finally need resting periods for the forest in Germany, which has been exploited for centuries. We need a new, ecologically oriented concept for future forest – not a hectic `forest conversion´, but simply forest development closer towards nature. This gives the forest as an ecosystem the necessary leeway to self-regulate and react to the emerging environmental changes. We need a systemic forest management that is no less profitable than the present one, but must be substantially more stable and resistant to foreseeable environmental changes. The aid for forest owners that all citizens are now required to pay through their taxes is only politically justified in the interest of common good, if the forests of the future that are being promoted by it, do not end up in the next disaster, some of which is produced by the forest management itself.

That is why the signatories request from the the Federal Government, and in particular you, Mrs Klöckner, a master plan worthy of the name:

On disaster areas (mainly in public forests!) reestablishment through natural forest development (ecological succession), among other things with pioneer tree species, is to be brought about. In private forests, ecological succession for reestablishment must be purposefully promoted. Larger bare areas should be planted with a maximum of 400 to 600 large plants of native species per hectare in order to permit ecological succession parallelly.
To promote ecological succession, the areas should no longer be completely and mechanically cleared; as much wood as possible should be left in the stand (to promote optimum soil and germ bed formation, soil moisture storage and natural protection against browsing). In private forests, the abandonment of use in disaster areas should be specifically promoted for ecological reasons and in order to relieve the burden on the timber market.

Regarding the promotion of reestablishment plantings in private forests: priority for native tree species (of regional origin); choose wide planting distances in order to leave enough space for the development of pioneer species. For the forests of the future: Minimize thinning (low-input principle), build up stocks through targeted development towards old thick trees, protect the inner forest climate / promote self-cooling function (should have highest priority due to rapidly progressing climate change!), prohibit heavy machinery, refrain from further road construction and expansion, permit and promote natural self-regulatory development processes in the cultivated forest and on (larger) separate areas in the sense of an compound system; drastically reduce the density of ungulate game (reform of hunting laws).

Like in the field of organic agriculture, which has been established since the 1980s, the crisis of our forests should be the reason today to transform at least two existing forestry-related universities. They should be turned into universities for interdisciplinary forest ecosystem management. This is a contribution not only to the further development of forestry science and silviculture in Germany, but also of global importance! The goal must be to produce wood through largely natural forest production and to start with it here in Germany, the birthplace of forestry.

Motto: SYSTEMIC FOREST ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT INSTEAD OF WOOD FACTORY

**your signature**

Share this with your friends:

%d bloggers like this: