Future generations pay for climate change

Zoltan Kun April 11, 2014 2
Future generations pay for climate change

Future generations will have to pay more for today’s carbon emissions than what governments across the world currently understand. The climate models used by policymakers around the world to estimate the economic and social costs of CO2 emissions have to be improved according to experts.

There has recently been an article published, which concluded that the reports by the UN climate panel serve an important function in setting the agenda for climate research. Thomas Sterner, expert on policy instruments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as a Coordinating Lead Author and his six co-authors think that yet the most important role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is to inform the global political discussion on how the harm caused by climate change should be handled.

Polar Bears adapt

“Our purpose with this article in Nature is to discuss models that will enable us to calculate a necessary minimum level for the global environmental damage of emitting an additional ton of carbon dioxide.” says Sterner.

The social cost of carbon correspond to the money saved when damages due to climate change are avoided as a result of the countries of the world undertaking policy that leads to reduced emissions of CO2.

‘Sweden has already gone further than what the U.S. is discussing, since we have a CO2 tax of about USD 150 per ton, or SEK 1 per kilo, of CO2 emissions from transports and energy,’ adds Mr. Sterner.

The article in Nature is entitled “Improve Economic Models of Climate Change.” The authors point to several weaknesses of the most commonly used climate models. However, they write that the models are useful, notwithstanding the significant uncertainties — since they do provide a minimum level and thus enable politicians to reduce the effects of climate change to some extent.

Also, the authors continue, modelers, economists and natural scientists must leave their ivory towers and cooperate with each other in order to identify research gaps and weaknesses, with a view to continuously improve their models. Economic climate models need to be updated more often to keep up with new research findings. If this is not done, the damage caused by CO2 emissions will be underestimated also in the future, which means that political decision-making around the world will continue to underestimate the true economic effects of climate change.

“Our society believes that youth must be better informed about the true costs of climate change. As they will have to pay the price of our inaction, they will have to be involved also in the decision-making processes about climate change discussions” says Zoltan Kun, chairman of the European Wilderness Society.

This post is based on an article available here.

2 Comments »

  1. Peter Taylor April 17, 2014 at 15:00 - Reply

    Sweden is a rich relatively low population country that has no economic underclass and can therefore afford $150 per tonne for carbon emissions- not so many other countries. Swedish heavy manufacturing also relocated, as with many in the EU, to non-Kyoto countries with no emission limits. China now leads the world in CO2 emissions.

    The snippets that are getting posted here need to be balanced with a critical appraisal of this econometric computer-modeled propaganda, as well as some study of the impact of what IPCC advocates in the way of emission controls and taxes, carbon trades etc.

    • Max A.E. Rossberg April 17, 2014 at 18:16 - Reply

      Hi,

      Well as always it is a matter of perspective! China just launched a website listing the largest polluters. I would not be surprised if china passes all of Europe in the development and usage of renewable energy.

      Climate change was caused by all of us, affects all of us and must be solved by all of us! Let’s not talk about others but rather what we ourself can contribute.

Leave A Response »


nine × 3 =

UA-1515706-76