Help saving the Blue Heart of Europe

The Balkans between Slovenia and Albania host some of the last wild rivers in Europe. About 80% of this region’s rivers are considered healthy and free flowing, unlike most waterways in Central Europe. Because of that and its rich culture, history and ecology, the Balkans are also described as the “Blue Heart of Europe”. However, these pristine rivers are threatened by an incredible amount of dam buildings and proposals. More than 3 000 hydropower dams are currently planned or built in the Balkans. The construction of hydropower projects often leads to severe interferences or even destruction of ecosystems as well as the displacement of communities. Furthermore, most of these damming projects and the accompanying damming and diverting of waterways will just produce little energy output. About 91% of the proposed projects in the Balkans would generate less than 10 megawatts, according to Patagonia. These dam constructions would also have significant consequences to the surrounding communities’ drinking water access. Furthermore, about a third of these dammed rivers run through the many National Parks of the Balkans. Consequently, these projects in the Balkans lead to a local and gobal outcry to stop the destruction of the Blue Heart of Europe.

Please also read: Why rivers should be wild, not dammed

Patagonia launches Blue Heart campaign to save wild rivers in the Balkans

The clothing brand Patagonia recently launched their Blue Heart campaign to raise awareness to the threats to the Blue Heart of Europe. The campaign will launch a petition and a full documentary in April. It tries to raise awareness to these controversial hydropower developments in the Balkans. Patagonia founder Yvon Chouinard said:

“I believe this wild place requires and deserves protection. The company has joined forces with the local communities and NGOs protesting the development. It’s a waste of money and a moral travesty that some of the world’s largest financial institutions have embraced this outdated and exploitative technology and are financing new dams in some of the last wild places in Europe. This is a fight too important to ignore.”

The European Wilderness Network includes WILDRivers, such as part of the Belá WILDRiver in Slovakia. We support Patagonia’s and Balkan Rivers effort to raise awarness for the destruction of  Europe’s Blue Heart!

The Vjosa River – one of Europe’s last undammed rivers

The Vjosa River in Albania is undammed and free flowing along its entire 270 kilometers long course from Greece to the Mediterranean. Canyons and braided river sections, islands, oxbows and meandering stretches characterise the river. In some sections the riverbed expands over more than 2 km in width. Almost all the Vjosa river tributaries are intact and free-flowing as well, creating a unique and rare river network.

The main source of the Vjosa River is near the Greek village of Vouvoussa. In Greece the river is named Aoos. It flows into the Adriatic Sea just north of the Narta lagoon, one of the biggest and ecologically richest lagoons of Albania. The Narta lagoon is protected as a Managed Nature Reserve. The meandering lower part of the Vjosa opens up into a valley with extensive wetlands. These wetlands provide habitats for spawning fish and migratory birds. The whole drainage area of the Vjosa in Greece and Alabnia is about 6 700 km² large. The average discharge of the river into the sea is about 204 m³/sec.

The diverse and pristine Vjosa river ecosystems 

The Vjosa river system is seen as of the last intact large river systems in Europe. It hosts various different ecosystems, from narrow gorges in the upper part to wide braided river sections in the middle part and a near-natural delta at the Adriatic Sea. However, there is not much scientific knowledge about the Vjosa, its biodiversity and natural dynamic processes. Only a handful of studies are available so far. Nevertheless, these few studies prove the importance of the river valley as Albania’s biodiversity hotspot.

The free flowing river provides habitat for various migratory fish species. For example the critically endangered European eel (Anguilla anguilla), or the sub-endemic Ohrid loach (Cobitis ohridana). The area also provides breeding ground for birds, such as the Stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus) or the little ringed plover (Charadrius dubius). The near threatened otter also finds a home there. The undisturbed morpho-dynamic processes with its huge sediment shifts lead to constant natural regeneration and change of these river habitats. The large and steep riverbanks offer breeding grounds for thousands of Sand martins (Riparia riparia), Kingfishers (Alcedo atthis) and Bee-eaters (Merops apiaster).

EWS - Albania -04795_
the Vjosa river in Albania

Large gravel banks with pioneer vegetation, side arms and islands, oxbows, ponds and alluvial forests with willows and plane trees (Platanus orientalis) are characteristic for the braided Vjosa river system. The floral biodiversity of the Vjosa ecosystem hosts a variety of endemic and endangered species, in particular the upper river section. Mixed Oak forests and Strawberry trees (Arbutus andrachne) characterise the lower valley. The Vjosa valley is the only habitat for Strawberry trees in Albania.

Social and cultural Values of the Vjosa river

The Vjosa river plays an important role in the daily lives of the people living in its surroundings. The river terraces provide fertile land for agriculture and farming. Fishing is another vial part of the local economy. Tourism on the Vjosa and its tributaries is increasing in the last years. In particular activities, such as rafting, canoeing, kayaking and swimming. Many small-scale businesses and eco-tourism companies in the area based their work and existence on the untouched and free-flowing river.

Scientific proof to underline the uniqueness of the Vjosa river ecosystems

A group of 30 international scientists from various fields is working on bridging the knowledge gap of the Vjosa river ecosystems. They conducted various scientific projects in the area of the proposed Poçem dam during in April 2017. The findings of the researcher’s work proofed that the complexity and sheer size of the river ecosystem as well as its dynamic processes are one of the last remaining ones with this quality in Europe. Most of the species and habitats have been long lost in other parts of Europe. This can be lead back to river regulations and dams. This one week of research in April 2017 initiated an extensive 3-year research program that is currently in preparations.

This scientific work on the Vjosa river is in particular important as the river is currently threatened by a number of dam proposals. The Vjosa is not protected itself but is the boarder for several protected areas, among others three National Parks. This results in growing pressure for development. Furthermore, there is no bilateral management plan for the entire river basin. This gives investors and energy companies the “golden” opportunity to develop hydropower projects in the valley. There are intentions to build about 38 hydropower plants in the entire Vjosa catchment. 6 of them are on the Greek side of the catchment, one, the Pigai Dam, is already in operation. The proposed projects on Albanian territory are along the Vjosa main channel as well as on the river’s tributaries. 4 of the tributaries projects are already finished while another 4 are under construction right now. Every single one of these dams would destroy the unique ecological value of the Vjosa river ecosystems. Every dam would significantly alter the river’s hydrological regime and its natural sediment transport.


Support the protection of Vjosa river

The campaign “Save the Blue Heart of Europe“, launched by a coalition of NGOs, tries to raise awareness about the “imminent dam craze on the Balkan peninsula and to spare the most valuable rivers and river stretches from destruction”. Together with local communities, scientists and supporters from all over Albania the campaign wants to get the Vjosa river get designated as a National Park (IUCN category II). This protection should preserve the river for the benefit of nature and for the people of the Vjosa valley. This status should also sustain the river’s potential for sustainable socio-economic development. The campaign also demands the termination of all the dam projects along the river and its tributaries to keep the ecosystem intact.

The European Wilderness Society helps and protects the last remnants of free flowing WILDRivers of Europe as part of the European Wilderness Network. Our network currently includes part of the WILDRivers in Uholka-Shyrokyy Luh Wilderness of Ukraine and Stara Reka WILDRiver embedded in the Central Balkan Wilderness. The Vjosa river as well as many other rivers in the Balkans, the Blue Heart of Europe, are potential candidates, like the Tagliamento in Italy, to become part of our network.



You May Also Like

Please Leave a Comment

Join more 100+ forest experts demanding a radical change in German forestry management.

Sign the Open Letter to the German Federal Minister of Forestry and Agriculture

Open Letter to the German Ministry of Food and Agriculture

Federal Ministry of
Food and Agriculture
Minister Julia Klöckner
11055 Berlin

Dear Minister Klöckner,

The current situation of the forest in Germany is worrying. It is a forest crisis not only driven by climate change. The current crisis management of the forestry industry is backward-looking and harmful to the forest. The declaration announced at the meeting of ministers in Moritzburg can be described as a `Moritzburg declaration of bankruptcy´. We call on the state forestry industry to, instead of expensive rushed actions, finally carry out an expert analysis of its own work and to involve all stakeholders in this process. What is called for is a consistent departure from plantation forestry and a radical shift towards a management that treats the forest as an ecosystem and no longer as a wood factory.

On 1stAugust 2019, five forestry ministers of CDU and CSU-led states adopted a so-called “master plan” for the forest in Germany, which was affected by heat, bark beetles, fire and drought. As of 2020, the federal government is to make 800 million euros available as a reaction to climate change. This money is to be used to repair the damage caused, reforest the damaged areas and carry out `climate-adapted´ forest conversion – including the use of non-native tree species that have not yet been cultivated in the forest. Research should therefore focus on on tree species suitability and forest plant breeding in the future – keyword: `Climate-adapted forest of the future 2100´.

Remarkably, the damage caused primarily by the extreme drought of 2018 is attributed solely to climate change. Climate change is meeting a forest that is systemically ill due to the planting of non-native tree species, species poverty, monocultures, uniform structure, average low age, mechanical soil compaction, drainage etc. A healthy, resistant forest would look differently! The master plan emphasizes: sustainable, multifunctional and `active´ forest management remains indispensable – and thereby means that its unnatural state cannot be changed. Reference is made to the `carbon storage and substitution effects´ of wood products. The use of wood, e.g. in the construction industry, should be increased and thus the demand for wood should be further fueled – while knowing that the forest in Germany already cannot meet this demand. In fact, forest owners are suffering from poor timber prices due to an oversupply of trunk wood on the world market.

All these demands make clear: the current forestry strategy, which has been practiced for decades, should not change in principle. The concept is simple: cut down trees – plant trees. At best, the `design´ of the future artificial forests consisting of perfectly calculated tree species mixtures, that are believed to survive climate change without damages, can be changed. In all seriousness, the intention is to continue selling the public a so-called `future strategy´ to save the forest. This strategy seamlessly follows the model of a wood factory, that is met with general rejection and must be regarded as a failure in view of the coniferous plantations that are currently collapsing on a large scale. An essential part of the forests that have currently died is exactly the part that was reestablished in 1947 as coniferous monocultures on a much larger area than today. There is only one difference to the situation at the time: considerable amounts of money are to be made available from taxes for forest owners this time.

Climate change is progressing, and this, without a doubt, has massive impacts on all terrestrial ecosystems, including forests. To pretend that the last two years of drought alone caused the disaster is too cheap. On closer inspection, the disaster is also the result of decades of a forestry focused on conifers – in a country that was once naturally dominated by mixed deciduous forests. People do not like to admit that for more than 200 years they have relied on the wrong species of commercial tree (spruce) and have also created artificial, ecologically highly unstable and thus high-risk forest ecosystems. A whole branch of business has become dependent on coniferous wood. And now the German coniferous timber industry is on the verge of bankruptcy.

It would only have been honest and also a sign of political greatness if you and the forestry ministers in Moritzburg had declared: Yes, our forestry industry has made mistakes in the past, and yes, we are ready for a relentless analysis that takes into account not only purely silvicultural, but also forest-ecological aspects. Instead, you have confined yourselves to pre-stamped excuses that are already familiar to everyone and that lack any self-critical reflection.

Clear is: We finally need resting periods for the forest in Germany, which has been exploited for centuries. We need a new, ecologically oriented concept for future forest – not a hectic `forest conversion´, but simply forest development closer towards nature. This gives the forest as an ecosystem the necessary leeway to self-regulate and react to the emerging environmental changes. We need a systemic forest management that is no less profitable than the present one, but must be substantially more stable and resistant to foreseeable environmental changes. The aid for forest owners that all citizens are now required to pay through their taxes is only politically justified in the interest of common good, if the forests of the future that are being promoted by it, do not end up in the next disaster, some of which is produced by the forest management itself.

That is why the signatories request from the the Federal Government, and in particular you, Mrs Klöckner, a master plan worthy of the name:

On disaster areas (mainly in public forests!) reestablishment through natural forest development (ecological succession), among other things with pioneer tree species, is to be brought about. In private forests, ecological succession for reestablishment must be purposefully promoted. Larger bare areas should be planted with a maximum of 400 to 600 large plants of native species per hectare in order to permit ecological succession parallelly.
To promote ecological succession, the areas should no longer be completely and mechanically cleared; as much wood as possible should be left in the stand (to promote optimum soil and germ bed formation, soil moisture storage and natural protection against browsing). In private forests, the abandonment of use in disaster areas should be specifically promoted for ecological reasons and in order to relieve the burden on the timber market.

Regarding the promotion of reestablishment plantings in private forests: priority for native tree species (of regional origin); choose wide planting distances in order to leave enough space for the development of pioneer species. For the forests of the future: Minimize thinning (low-input principle), build up stocks through targeted development towards old thick trees, protect the inner forest climate / promote self-cooling function (should have highest priority due to rapidly progressing climate change!), prohibit heavy machinery, refrain from further road construction and expansion, permit and promote natural self-regulatory development processes in the cultivated forest and on (larger) separate areas in the sense of an compound system; drastically reduce the density of ungulate game (reform of hunting laws).

Like in the field of organic agriculture, which has been established since the 1980s, the crisis of our forests should be the reason today to transform at least two existing forestry-related universities. They should be turned into universities for interdisciplinary forest ecosystem management. This is a contribution not only to the further development of forestry science and silviculture in Germany, but also of global importance! The goal must be to produce wood through largely natural forest production and to start with it here in Germany, the birthplace of forestry.


**your signature**

Share this with your friends:

%d bloggers like this: